Skip to content
ADORAIntellectual Property

WIPO D2000-0190 · 2000

Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. v. Jack Myers

Complaint deniedbridgestone-firestone.net
In Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. v. Jack Myers, D2000-0190 (WIPO, 2000), the panel denied the complaint, holding that a critic does not have to add a word like 'sucks' to a domain to signal a criticism site. A disclaimer and a different extension from the trademark owner's own were enough to establish a legitimate interest.

The parties

Complainant
Bridgestone Firestone, Inc.
Respondent
Jack Myers

Read the decision

The full text is published by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. We summarise it here; the decision itself is the authority.

WIPO decision D2000-0190

Summarised by Gergana Dimitrova, who worked at the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center from 2018 to 2021 and sits as a domain name panelist at the Czech Arbitration Court. Full background.

Someone has taken a domain that uses your brand?

The first assessment is free and comes back within 24 hours. If the case is weak we say so rather than take the fee.