Skip to content
ADORAIntellectual Property

WIPO D2000-0993 · 2000

Smart Design LLC v. Carolyn Hughes

Complaint deniedsmartdesign.com
In Smart Design LLC v. Carolyn Hughes, D2000-0993 (WIPO, 2000), the panel dismissed the complaint and found reverse domain name hijacking, calling it 'a clear abuse of the Policy designed to deprive the Respondent of her domain name.' The respondent had used the domain for a consulting business before the complaint was filed.

The parties

Complainant
Smart Design LLC
Respondent
Carolyn Hughes

Read the decision

The full text is published by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. We summarise it here; the decision itself is the authority.

WIPO decision D2000-0993

Summarised by Gergana Dimitrova, who worked at the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center from 2018 to 2021 and sits as a domain name panelist at the Czech Arbitration Court. Full background.

Someone has taken a domain that uses your brand?

The first assessment is free and comes back within 24 hours. If the case is weak we say so rather than take the fee.